Why building reform must go further

In a paper submitted as a response to the NSW Government’s ‘Building Stronger Foundations’ discussion, the Australian Institute of Architects have recommended a fundamental overhaul of building regulation.

The institute recommends improving compliance, accountability and better protection for consumers.


They have put forward 25 recommendations addressing the full building design and delivery process, proposing solutions to stop the compromise of quality resulting in poor safety and economic outcomes for consumers.

The gaps that the Institute has identified include:

  • Bringing developers into the regulatory regime, with a statutory duty of compliance and ongoing duty of care to subsequent owners
  • Enhancing the quality and thoroughness of documentation required to adequately cover safety and compliance risks before building work commences
  • Introducing a statutory requirement that apartment buildings be built in accordance with detailed documentation, ensuring alignment between the as-designed building and the as-built building
  • Introducing a holistic, independent inspection and certification regime to provide independent oversight of construction techniques and oversight of adherence to codes, standards and council approvals through an on-site independent inspection regime that includes a clerk of works and an on-site architect
  • Graduating the regulatory system to direct stronger regulation to higher risk areas such as complex multi-storey buildings.

NSW Chapter President, Kathlyn Loseby, said the Institute had consistently supported government proposals. She says, “Currently, anyone in Australia can procure and construct an apartment building. No evidence of any education, of any experience, of any suitability or capacity, or of insurances held is required. This is completely unacceptable and must urgently change.”

The Institute’s recommendations note that most of the defects found to date are in the multi-residential sector, where there are multiple small owners. Ms. Loseby notes that we are in a culture now that prioritises time and cost-saving over quality. She says, “As architects we have a duty of care to the entire community, something that is explicitly acknowledged in the Institute’s code of conduct.”

She adds, “An immediate response is needed to rectify buildings with defects, including flammable cladding, for the safety of all people.”


Story courtesy of the Australian Institute of Architects.

Images via Unsplash.

Get our enews

Design and development news that comes to you


Mandragore: Growing a carbon neutral residential tower

It might be just a little bit taller than your average mangrove forest, but it may have the ...

Maison François: Concrete cube to fabulous French bistro

Transforming what had been referred to as “one giant concrete cube” was going to take a little more ...

Macquarie Park project to redevelop how we work and play

MQX4 is one of four new buildings that will form the dynamic Macquarie Exchange, Australia’s first Community Business ...

The kids are alright: Students' plans for affordable housing

An Australian-first inter-University design competition saw Architecture, Engineering and Construction (AEC) students’ team up to face the challenge ...

Bluethumb Art Prize - meet the judges and enter today!

With entries for the 2020 Bluethumb Art Prize opening on October 1, let’s meet the judges who are ...


Stay connected to the SPEC

Join our reader network by signing up to our weekly newsletter and receive design and development news straight to your inbox

© 2018 Universal Media Co. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Service. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Universal Media Co.